May 02, 2015

Review: The Garden of Evening Mists


The Garden of Evening Mists
The Garden of Evening Mists by Twan Eng Tan

My rating: 5 of 5 stars



This was a truly, truly beautiful book. On the one hand it's a fascinating look into a place and a period of time that no longer exists. On the other hand, it is best described as a meditation on memory and time and love. It's easy to summarize and say that the book is about an English-Speaking Chinese Malayan survivor of a Japanese slave-labor camp in WWII, and how she comes to find some peace in the garden of a man who used to be the Japanese Emperor's gardener. But that does this story no justice.

Yun Ling is suffering from a disorder which will eventually take her thoughts from her. She will be left unable to use words, which is why she finds it important to set down her memories before she loses the ability to do so. The memories, however, seem to me to have been more of a burden to her than anything else. Memories of losing her sister in the camp, memories of her lost love, memories of friends dying. It makes one wonder what life was worth for her. Maybe losing her memories would eventually be a blessing. At the end I wasn't sure if it was a tragedy or not. She ensured that her sister would be remembered by others when she was no longer capable, and perhaps that's more real than living in the memories of one person. Maybe not.

This book is beautifully written, despite not being full of elaborate prose. Sometimes simplicity is best, as realized in the idea of wabi-sabi. I highly recommend this book.



View all my reviews

March 06, 2015

Review: Beowulf


Beowulf
Beowulf by Unknown

My rating: 4 of 5 stars



Obviously this is a difficult read, aside from the poem itself. The details of the exact wording the original author (unknown) intended is of course unknowable, but Tolkien, being quite the expert, was attempting to get as close to it as possible. His difficulty arose from having to attempt to translate what the scribe actually wrote, but the scribe was actually less an expert on the original poem or language than Tolkien himself. While this is a good thing for modern-day scholars, for lay-people it gets a bit esoteric and perhaps more involved than we actually want. I'll leave it up to actual scholars to judge Tolkien's accuracy in translation (although there may not be any qualified to argue against the man himself; he certainly wasn't shy about declaring other experts wrong).

As far as the translation of the poem, some will doubtless find it difficult and unnatural, but it captures the cadence and style of the Old English he was attempting to translate. He wanted to make it readable to modern English-speakers, obviously, but he also wanted it to feel transported back to that time. I enjoyed it, others will have to judge for themselves.

This is not a book for people who only loved Lord of the Rings, or especially only loved The Hobbit. If you liked The Silmarillion, this may indeed be a book for you, and for anyone who is a Beowulf scholar of course it's going to be on the menu.



View all my reviews

September 12, 2014

Review: Saga, Volume 2


Saga, Volume 2
Saga, Volume 2 by Brian K. Vaughan

My rating: 3 of 5 stars



I'm enjoying this series, but I'm also wondering why it's supposed to be so "ground-breaking" and original. As I said about the first, there's nothing particularly wrong with it, but it's only original if you're unaware of earlier sci-fantasy (notable examples are the worlds of Warhammer 40k and Shadowrun, although this might also encompass Burroughs' Barsoom series). I typically like Brian K. Vaughan's writing although it seems to me sometimes he tries too hard to buck expectations. Again, the art is alright, not what I would call a stunning example of comic-book art but certainly not the worst.

I like this series, but honestly I can't say I'd be missing much if I'd never read it, and certainly I would say if you have to choose between this and Fables, go for Fables.



View all my reviews

September 08, 2014

Review: Horns


Horns
Horns by Joe Hill

My rating: 5 of 5 stars



Wow, I have to give it to Joe Hill. That was an excellent story. I like that there was no mention of why this thing occurred, although one is free to interpret the story as they wish. Quite a lovely ending too. Hill is not yet what I'd call a master wordsmith, although he can manage some nice turns of phrase, but I feel he'll get there eventually. Really just a brilliant book. I'd recommend it to just about anyone.



View all my reviews

June 30, 2014

Review: A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius


A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius
A Heartbreaking Work of Staggering Genius by Dave Eggers

My rating: 2 of 5 stars



Well, whatever literary virtue there was to this book was severely undermined by the pretentiousness and self-centeredness of the author. I can understand that this was sort of a stream of consciousness narration of how the author dealt with the deaths of his parents (which occurred at a close proximity in time). I just don't like that it seemed like the book took up years of my life. It is vastly longer than it needs to be. Also, stream of consciousness doesn't work well unless the writer really knows what they're doing, and it's fairly evident Eggers didn't know how to handle it that well.

I can sometimes enjoy books written in first person by someone who is altogether unlikable, but the worst sin is being shallow and pretentious at the same time. If I wanted to read an autobiography, I'd rather read one by someone who either knows how to make the mundane entertaining or who has lived a life that's entertaining to read about. That's not this book.

The prose was fine. In most places it was serviceable and in others there were flashes of brilliance, but those were far too few. The length of time he spends on such vignettes as his interview with MTV or his time at Might Magazine was simply agonizing in how pathetic his pandering plea for attention was, and even though his smarmy self-awareness means he knows he's pandering, he does it anyway, all the while thinking he's being cute. It's not. It's just plain awful.

I can't say the book was bad because it really wasn't terribly written. But I couldn't honestly recommend this to anyone either.



View all my reviews

April 07, 2014

Review: The Last Policeman


The Last Policeman
The Last Policeman by Ben H. Winters

My rating: 3 of 5 stars



Pretty good. The mystery was not the most intriguing, but it wasn't ever meant to be anything out of the bounds of normal human behavior. The setting with the end of the world imminent creates a more memorable backdrop, but other than as set dressing it serves little purpose. Of course that's not to say that this book should have been written more as speculative fiction than detective novel because I enjoyed it for what it is. The prose was really the weakest part, not that it ever delved into being truly cliche or trite, but mostly it was uninspired. Still, a good book overall. I will definitely be reading the sequel.



View all my reviews

March 22, 2014

Review: The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind


The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind
The Boy Who Harnessed the Wind by William Kamkwamba

My rating: 4 of 5 stars



Great story. Pretty well written, although it's a bit scattershot, but that's ok. I loved the technical aspects of his work, although I understand maybe not everyone will because not everyone is fascinated by electronics and electricity like the author is (and like I am). I would recommend this to pretty much anyone!



View all my reviews

December 25, 2013

Review: World War Z: An Oral History of the Zombie War


World War Z: An Oral History of the Zombie War
World War Z: An Oral History of the Zombie War by Max Brooks

My rating: 4 of 5 stars



Interesting. More of a social commentary than a novel, it's a bunch of short stories tied together by the device of the "author" being someone travelling around talking to survivors after the outbreak is controlled. It's not just an exploration of human nature but of the successes and failures of government, science, modern economic policies and just about every aspect of the world we live in. I don't think the combination of short stories and social commentary worked in every case because they really deserved a longer treatment, but it was a pretty good concept. Also if you're looking for characters to invest in emotionally and get attached to, that doesn't happen very often in this book. Still and all, I'd definitely recommend it.



View all my reviews

May 24, 2013

Review: Deadhouse Gates


Deadhouse Gates
Deadhouse Gates by Steven Erikson

My rating: 3 of 5 stars



Man, Steven Erikson writes some really, really bad prose. Also some of his passages where he's trying to express character's emotions are either laughable or just too terrible to laugh at. That being said, that's not the case most of the time, nor does it make the book not worth reading. It just severely detracts from it.

Anyway, this book continues on one storyline that was begun in [b:Gardens of the Moon|55399|Gardens of the Moon (The Malazan Book of the Fallen, #1)|Steven Erikson|http://d.gr-assets.com/books/1355144064s/55399.jpg|2646042], but introduces some new characters in the typical Erikson way, which is to explain nothing about them at all and let details drop as they will in the course of the narrative. It's annoying to me but I honestly will not say that it's an objectively wrong way of doing things. The action jumps to a different land across some ocean (where this is in relation to the first story I have very little idea since the author seems to find it unimportant to actually lay out the geography of the world).

There are two (or three) distinct stories which never actually intersect anywhere, so one wonders why they're crammed in the same book other than that they're occurring approximately at the same time. However, as far as they go, they are interesting stories. I do like the world that Erikson is building at this point, as it has lots of interesting features. Some of the characters are interesting, some are incomprehensible.

I'd barely recommend this book, but only to those who really can wait for gratification and who can tolerate really bad prose in places.



View all my reviews

April 11, 2013

Review: The Kassa Gambit


The Kassa Gambit
The Kassa Gambit by M.C. Planck

My rating: 3 of 5 stars



It was a good story, but not outstanding. Worth reading because it's so easy, but the revelation at the end is rather anti-climactic, and it's all rather rushed. The characters don't feel entirely natural either. Maybe it's that they're too anti-stereotypical to feel very real. I'd read more by this author, but only if it gets a bit better.



View all my reviews

March 15, 2013

Review: Gardens of the Moon


Gardens of the Moon
Gardens of the Moon by Steven Erikson

My rating: 3 of 5 stars



Well, I liked it, but I find it far from the incredibly mind-blowing fantasy I'd been led to believe. The world-building aspect was nice, but the fact that the author just starts throwing elements at you with no explanation isn't nice. Erikson takes it to crazy levels of "just roll with it". You have no idea who these people are, what they're doing or why, and especially when it comes to any of the magical elements. It makes no sense. There are several inter-twining stories that really seem to just fall apart at the end. Also, the poems or whatever they were at the beginning of chapters were horrible. Just plain really bad. The prose throughout the book was nothing special, but at least it was serviceable.

Frankly, there are some extremely cringe-worthy lines in this book. Something about people looking on with horror as the Adjunct killed the person she used to be...well, it was just plain bad.

All that being said, this book actually was fairly good and interesting. It's neither as horribly bad in parts as [b:The Night Land|970602|The Night Land|William Hope Hodgson|http://d.gr-assets.com/books/1348444715s/970602.jpg|955499] nor as amazing in others, but it's kind of similar. The story is definitely good enough to make up for the weaknesses. Not quite enough to make you ignore them, but it's not that big a book. I do plan on reading more of the series, and I hope Erikson overcame these flaws in his later books.



View all my reviews

January 31, 2013

Review: This Book Is Full of Spiders: Seriously, Dude, Don’t Touch It


This Book Is Full of Spiders: Seriously, Dude, Don’t Touch It
This Book Is Full of Spiders: Seriously, Dude, Don’t Touch It by David Wong

My rating: 4 of 5 stars



Wow, that was far beyond what I was expecting. I liked [b:John Dies at the End|1857440|John Dies at the End (John Dies at the End, #1)|David Wong|http://d.gr-assets.com/books/1189289716s/1857440.jpg|1858059] quite a bit, but felt it under-capitalized on its potential. This book was truly impressive. The difference, I think, was that this one was a more cohesive story, and despite the fact that the reader never truly knows why event that drives the plot occurs, the narrative holds together extremely well. I have to say that this is one of the most tightly written, suspenseful books I have ever read. Of course I'm not into thrillers that much, but I don't think anybody would describe this book as anything but fast-paced. On top of that, this book, like the first one, reminds me of [b:The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy|11|The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy (Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, #1)|Douglas Adams|http://d.gr-assets.com/books/1327656754s/11.jpg|3078186] in that it achieves a fine balance of comedy and poignancy. I don't want to include spoilers in my review, but the events of the ending are both touching and bizarre. While the vocabulary of the book is nothing that would challenge your average high-school graduate, the concepts brought forth in the book are those that are relevant to how we view ourselves and each other.

I don't want to go on too long, so I'll have to end here with a simple thought: read this book! You won't regret it, although it seriously is full of spiders.



View all my reviews

January 29, 2013

Review: Warm Bodies


Warm Bodies
Warm Bodies by Isaac Marion

My rating: 3 of 5 stars



Well, it's an interesting experience. I thought the writing was great and I know this author has some serious potential. However, the book is irretrievably stupid. The plot doesn't make any sense at all, which I guess is ok if it's more of a character story, but this isn't really a character story. I hope the author was writing down to his audience, and that his moralizing and philosophizing are really so juvenile because he deliberately spurned complexity. I don't generally go for "dreams come true" books where there is a completely unearned happy ending.

Also, the main female character was irritating beyond belief, especially as the delivery method for most of the story's philosophy.

All in all, I hope the author chooses to dedicate his talents to more deserving stories than this garbage.



View all my reviews

August 13, 2012

Review: Julian Comstock: A Story of 22nd-Century America


Julian Comstock: A Story of 22nd-Century America
Julian Comstock: A Story of 22nd-Century America by Robert Charles Wilson

My rating: 4 of 5 stars



This was an unexpectedly good book. I picked this up mainly because of the author's other works like Spin and Darwinia: A Novel of a Very Different Twentieth Century , both of which are astoundingly original and well-written. This book didn't sound as interesting as either of those. I'm not much interested in Westerns, which is what the description of this book made it seem like to me. I was wrong about that, however.

The book begins in the year 2172 in a semi post-apocalyptic world. 21st century civilization collapsed due to a number of reasons, but mainly because the oil ran out. Disease ran rampant (as it would if we lost our modern medicines) and humans suffered from infertility to the point that humans were threatened with extinction. By the time of the events of this book, however, civilization in the United States and Europe has progressed roughly up to the age of steam.

The political situation is set up such that the US has expanded its borders to the equator (either at the Panama Canal or past it) and almost the north pole, although the polar ice cap has melted. The melting of the ice is itself a plot point in that the European powers claim to control the now-extant Northwest Passage, and the US of course denies this claim. The US and Europe are perpetually at war over the issue.

This is the backdrop for the story of the titular character, Julian Comstock. He is an aristocrat exiled to live in the country out west because his uncle, the President, is afraid of having him as a rival, but unwilling to simply kill him out of hand. The story is told by a Julian's friend Adam Hazzard, a commoner but one with an unusual amount of writing ability and education. Adam is with Julian from his exile to his rise through the ranks of the Army (and his eventual end) and details the story throughout.

In reality, this book seems to be an exercise in the craft of writing, moreso than it is an effort to tell the story. The story itself is as simple as it sounds, although it is not without adventure along the way. The episodes in the tale serve both to illustrate points about Julian as well as to spice the story up and keep it from becoming dull reading. It's not as if Wilson is attempting to blind the reader to what it is though; indeed, he tells us over and over again that the writer (Hazzard) is emulating his favorite author, a man named Charles Curtis Easton, in writing a tale full of adventure, humor, and tragedy. Which of course is what Wilson himself is doing. The story hearkens back to an older style of sci-fi novel wherein any science elements served only to liven up the narrative by allowing the existence of ray guns or flying through space. Note that I am not calling this book science fiction other than that futurism falls under the category of sci-fi by agreement.

Although the narration itself is quite serviceable, the prose tends towards a plainness which can be rather irritating. Hazzard's impenetrable naivete is really too much to take at times, even if it is a put-on (which question I pondered quite a bit as the story went on). Of course, unreliable narrators are not necessarily a drawback, as most definitely proven by Severian in Gene Wolfe's Shadow and Claw: The First Half of 'The Book of the New Sun' . Neil Gaiman (a devoted fan of Wolfe's), while not being prone to giving first person narration, also has a habit of being unreliable in his storytelling, presenting his stories from a third-person limited viewpoint. In other words, one needn't be too bothered by a lack of knowledge on the part of the narrator if the writing is done well enough.

Of course, all along, while Adam is writing the story of Julian, he's really telling his own story. Julian's thoughts and feelings were always presented as being opaque to Adam, although he could possibly have presumed to know Julian better than anyone else did. The fact is that Wilson was writing the story of a character who considered himself secondary to another character who was, in fact, secondary to his own story. The question is whether Wilson succeeded in writing an interesting story. I think the answer is yes, although I can see how someone less impressed with Wilson's style may not be as favorably inclined towards a book which is about a writer writing a book. But Wilson (and Wilson as Hazzard) never set out to write a book which is really more than the formula he sets forth as Mr. Easton's model; a boy goes out, has adventures and finally comes home. And I think he succeeds at writing that story admirably.

View all my reviews

June 21, 2012

Review: The Light Fantastic


The Light Fantastic
The Light Fantastic by Terry Pratchett

My rating: 4 of 5 stars



Well that was really good. Much improved from the first book, and much more in the style of the later Discworld books. I enjoyed it thoroughly!



View all my reviews

June 18, 2012

Review: The Warlord of Mars


The Warlord of Mars
The Warlord of Mars by Edgar Rice Burroughs

My rating: 3 of 5 stars



This one is still enjoyable, but it does drag a little, as nothing substantially new occurs in it. It follows the formula established in the first two books of John Carter again and again falling victim to some nefarious evil-doer (in this case two characters carried over from the last book). Tales of his adventures follow. It's not bad, but if you're not in the mood for more of almost exactly the same, it tends to be a little boring. Also, it's a bit too long to be merely a rehash of the same plot from the last two books, and although Burroughs' writing is never less than serviceable, there's only so many times you can take reading about how much John Carter loves fighting.

All in all, I'd say that if you really liked the first two Barsoom books, you should read this one, but if you were bored by the second one, there will be nothing new here for you.



View all my reviews

June 08, 2012

Review: Reamde


Reamde
Reamde by Neal Stephenson

My rating: 4 of 5 stars



Truly a good book. I haven't read all of Stephenson's works, but I was worried that the newer his books were, the slower they moved along. Snow Crash remains the fastest-paced of his novels, but Reamde certainly picks up the pace compared to later releases like Anathem.

This is one of the most interesting books I've read in a while. The basic plot is that a computer hacker wrote a virus for users of the fictional game "T'Rain" that just happened to ensnare the Russian mob, a member of whom kidnaps Zula, the niece of the founder of T'Rain. Their plot to wreak vengeance on the hacker goes astray when they run afoul of terrorists bent on sneaking to American and committing acts of terror there.

The official blurb of the book only mentions the "main" character Richard Forthrast, but in reality the book revolves around Zula. Then again, it does center around Richard for a long time at the beginning, but Zula's story grows in scope until it dominates. This is both good and bad. Stephenson being Stephenson, he never seems to feel that too much information is a bad thing. For a long, long time, I thought that this book was about Reamde (the computer virus) and T'Rain. Turns out, both of them are almost entirely irrelevant. And yet Stephenson spends hundreds of pages on Richard and his dealing with the game, which is responsible for getting the story moving along, but not at all for keeping it moving along. As a matter of fact, I thought a subplot was developing along the lines of the break between the "Bright" and "Earthtone" coalitions in the game, which turned out to go nowhere. So there's the main problem with this book: it's just too much information which is unnecessary.

That being said, it's still a really, really great thriller. When events finally get to the point where the terrorists (with Zula in tow) make it to Canada, stuff really starts happening, and it's pretty amazing. Another reviewer said this was like "14 Die Hards in a row" and that's definitely true. May not be a selling point for some, but it is for me! However, all the intense action tends to be broken up by long pauses, at least until the ending. And then it's just amazing!

One of the best things about this book was the characters. The cast is wide and varied, and it's great. To begin with, none of them turn out to be superheros like John McClain (of the Die Hard series) who can do impossible things and survive in the worst of circumstances despite being shot at by a dozen enemies. None of them are James Bond. The couple of guys who do have military expertise use it to great advantage, but are not supermen, so there are no scenes of them mowing down 20 terrorists. The civilians are all special in their own way, but they're still just ordinary people trying to survive an extraordinary situation. And really, that's what makes them great. Zula especially has got to be one of the most heroic yet ordinary person that a book has ever had. Frankly, she's one of my favorite characters of all time, and probably my favorite female character of all time. She's not some shrinking violet, but at the same time she doesn't somehow become a female Punisher taking on all comers. Nor does the author overcompensate by making her either over- or under-sexualized, or a tough-talking wisecracker who can give as good as she gets. She's an intelligent, interesting person who just happens to be thrown in unimaginable circumstances and does her best to survive, and through sheer force of will just happens to do a great job at it. If you read this and don't find yourself saying that Zula is great, there's just something wrong with you.

The other characters on Zula's side are also pretty interesting. Csongor, the big Hungarian computer expert who happens to fall in love with Zula is a very admirable character, as is Yuxia, the little Chinese woman who is determined to come to Zula's aid no matter what. Marlon, the hacker who wrote Reamde is a little less well-fleshed out, but still a cool guy and he adds important points to the story at times. Sokolov, the Russian ex-military "security expert" is the hardass gunman you want on your side. Olivia, the British-Chinese spy lady, is smart and capable, and Seamus, the Boston-Irish terrorist hunter has a smart mouth and is good with a gun. As a matter of fact, I'd go so far as to say that just about all of these people could star in their own books. The only one who's not as well fleshed out is Jones, the terrorist, but he at least is not a cardboard cutout of a jihadist. I would guess that probably Stephenson didn't actually want to delve into the psychology of a terrorist. That's a deep, deep topic in itself and he already had a couple of plots and a dozen characters to worry about.

Stephenson lets his sense of humor come through a lot, and it definitely adds to the appeal. Examples include Yuxia, Csongor and Marlon wash up in the Phillipines and just happen to take a bus carrying European sex-tourists, for one, and in another instance when Sokolov refers to the American separatists as the "American Taliban" for another. The book has moments of humor in the middle of the bleak desperation of the situation, which keeps the mood from ever getting too heavy. It's really a quite good strategy to keep the book from being monotone.

The only real problem of this book is Stephenson's absolute need to just dump pointless facts and information on us about any and every topic addressed. Not that authors can't provide details here and there, but, as an example, when Stephenson says that Richard has noise-cancelling earmuffs for use when he's at the family reunion shooting range, I don't actually need to be told how they work. I mean, if I didn't already know how, I'd assume it was some techno-magical device, which it is. And early on in the book, he spends a lot of time talking about Corporation 9592 (the corporation behind T'Rain) including the feud between the two authors they have working on writing the game, the economic system, the Brights and Earthtones, the arbitrary distinction between good and evil characters, etc, etc. Not to say that it doesn't need to be mentioned, just not at the length of dozens of pages.

Still, despite the obsessive need of Stephenson's to detail absolutely everything going on, this is a fantastic thriller, and I'd recommend it to anybody who's a fan of that genre. This is most certainly not a work of science fiction (that we would normally recognize as such) so if you're into Stephenson for that reason alone, you probably don't want to go near this one.



View all my reviews

June 07, 2012

Review: The Gods of Mars


The Gods of Mars
The Gods of Mars by Edgar Rice Burroughs

My rating: 4 of 5 stars



Man, what an adventure! This book resumes the story of John Carter ten years later, as he is once again magically (not really) transported to Mars. After that, this book is one of the fastest-paced reads I've ever had! Carter returns only to discover the terrible secret that has lain at the heart of Martian religion for thousands of years, and that his wife, Dejah Thoris, has disappeared. He is reunited with his friend, the Jeddak Tars Tarkas. This is an exciting story and for anyone who likes the first story, it not only compares favorably, but in some ways improves upon it.

My only criticism is that Burroughs' writing is sometimes just too dramatic. It doesn't quite feel natural that John Carter himself would describe the "red mist" coming over his eyes time and time again (since this is written in first-person view). The writing should be a little less flowery, but that doesn't seriously detract from enjoyment of the story.

There's an interesting over-arching theme to this book, and that is that the Martian religion is not only flawed, it leads them to do horrible things in the belief that they have some divine right to do them. While it's never stated explicitly, it seems like the author was at least making some comments on the power of religion to make people behave terribly. Given the otherwise completely pulpy, substance-free nature of the John Carter series, it's quite surprising that he would make such a point about religion in this book. Just another surprise, and one reason why Burroughs can't simply be dismissed as a pulp writer.

All in all, a great follow-up to A Princess of Mars. Well worth reading!



View all my reviews

June 04, 2012

Review: Singularity Sky


Singularity Sky
Singularity Sky by Charles Stross

My rating: 0 of 5 stars



This book, like many sci-fi books, has an interesting idea and tries to do too much by building a book around it. The central plot is that an alien intelligence comes to a world which is deliberately trapped in an arrested state where the aristocracy rules over a land of peasants and the economy is mostly agrarian. The aliens drop devices on the planet that can basically grant anyone's wishes, with predictable results on the order and structure of this world.

The other plotline revolves around an agent who is attempting to keep the imperial power from going back in time to defeat what the empire considers an invading enemy. The two plots finally meet at the end, but for the vast majority of the book have very little to do with each other.

While I enjoyed Stross' writing for the most part, the book suffers from the common failing of trying to build a story around an interesting idea. The characters are not truly memorable, although they're serviceable for hanging the plot on. The other problem is that the plot that the author chooses to spend most of his time on (the one about the agents trying to stop the imperial fleet from time travelling) is a lot less interesting than what's happening on the planet. The entire story is driven by the changes happening on the planet, but aside from maybe a total of 40 or 50 pages we don't see what's happening there at all!

The author, in the name of realism, uses a lot of descriptions of the fleet ships, detailing their hulls, weapons, and crew. It honestly gets quite burdensome, even for those of us who read plenty of military fiction. I think he overdoes it. In comparison, David Drake is much more readable in terms of his description both of his military technology and the battles fought. Less is more, as they say.

All in all, I would recommend this book for the average sci-fi reader looking for something to read, but this is another one I would not lead someone into the genre with. I liked it, but it failed to capitalize on its most interesting component, instead choosing to focus on the much less interesting story of the two agents.



View all my reviews

May 11, 2012

Review: A Walking Tour of the Shambles


A Walking Tour of the Shambles
A Walking Tour of the Shambles by Neil Gaiman

My rating: 3 of 5 stars



This is a very short book, and was actually co-written by Neil Gaiman and Gene Wolfe (whom Gaiman has often declared himself a fan of). It purports to be a walking tour of an area known as "The Shambles", which is a fictional neighborhood in Chicago (where Wolfe lives) and obviously is the site of some extremely strange history. Some of the locations include a really weird church, a house of clocks, and a house belonging to H.H. Holmes (America's first serial killer). All of which remain rather dangerous for the casual visitor.

This book is fun, and while not a long read is an easy recreational read, sure to please both Gaiman and Wolfe's fans.



View all my reviews