April 30, 2012

Old Nathan


Old Nathan
Old Nathan by David Drake

My rating: 3 of 5 stars



Pretty good. I like the way David Drake writes, but the Tennessean dialect as written really annoyed me. People talking that way doesn't bother me, but it's so unnatural to read it that it made it hard to concentrate. Drake fans should read it, as should anyone who likes reading about magic but in a more realistic setting.



View all my reviews

April 20, 2012

Bios


Bios
Bios by Robert Charles Wilson

My rating: 3 of 5 stars



Like many sci-fi stories, this one was based around a single concept (which I can't really talk about or it'll spoil the book). There's not really anything wrong with that, but it does tend to make the characters' stories less compelling. In such a short book it's hard to to really work up much emotional connection to the characters, although the author does sketch out a reasonable back story for the two main characters.

This book is well-written and interesting. It might have been better if it were longer, which is not something I say too often. But with more length he might have developed some of the ideas better. I just feel like the denouement could have been expanded a little.

All in all, if you're a fan of sci-fi or just Robert Charles Wilson, I'd certainly recommend this book to you.



View all my reviews

The Crossing


The Crossing
The Crossing by Cormac McCarthy

My rating: 4 of 5 stars



Well, that was a sad story. Folks who really can't stand to read books where people don't come away happier in the end than at the beginning probably shouldn't read this one. I still liked it. McCarthy's writing was still powerful and vivid, but there was a lot more concern for the actual story in this than there was in All the Pretty Horses.

In short, this book deals with a young man named Billy Parham crossing into Mexico (thus the name) three times. To put it succinctly, he meets with tragedy each time. This is not a feel-good book, but as usual from McCarthy, it's beautiful and well worth it.



View all my reviews

April 17, 2012

Run Toward the Nightland; Magic of the Oklahoma Cherokees



Run Toward the Nightland; Magic of the Oklahoma Cherokees by Jack Frederick Kilpatrick

My rating: 3 of 5 stars



Pretty interesting stuff. He included the texts of many incantations and the music of some which were to be sung. His notation system for the Cherokee language leaves something to be desired, as there's no pronunciation guide provided with this book. I suppose the author presumed the reader would have previous familiarity with his writings. The spells and author commentary provide much insight into how the Cherokee view the world and their place in it. For example, a Cherokee home (at least when he wrote the book) was rarely locked when the owner was out, but it was definitely warded against evil intruders.

Interesting reading for those who want to know more about how Cherokee people thought, but not for those wanting to know more history. Also, if one were looking for real Native American magic, this is it. Not only do you get the text of the spell, but the instructions as to how it is to be cast. Unfortunately, Cherokee magic done in English has no potency, so too bad for all the witches out there who were hoping for some new spells.

If the book had gone one for three or four hundred pages, it would have been far too boring and bland, but it clocks in under 200 so the average reader should be able to get through it without too much trouble.



View all my reviews

April 10, 2012

City At The End Of Time


City At The End Of Time
City At The End Of Time by Greg Bear

My rating: 3 of 5 stars



This is an interesting book, but overall a pretty difficult read. Others have pointed out that this is a retelling of William Hope Hodgson's The Night Land. This is true, in a way. Bear even mentions that book obliquely in a passage where the speaker says something to the effect of he went in search of a man who wrote of The Last Redoubt, only to find that he'd been killed in WWI. The plot is not really a redo of that book, however. While both books deal with a city that stands alone against the forces that wish to destroy what little remains of humanity, that's about the end of the similarities.

This city, we soon come to find out, stands as the last bastion of humanity in a universe where time itself is running down. The Chaos has eaten away all the rest of the universe except for the three cities of humanity which remain. It's not a bad setup, really. While you could imagine that there might be some celestial salvation for the people in The Last Redoubt, there will be none for those living in The Kalpa as the universe breathes its last breath. In one of these cities, part of the story follows two "ancient breeds", beings who are designed as throwbacks to earlier variations of humanity, although the time when humans held fleshly form was so long ago it cannot even be counted in the trillions of years. These two breeds, Jebrassy and Tiadba, are determined to break out of the boundaries of their world and go forth beyond the city walls to find out what lies beyond. Meanwhile, at a time which is roughly the present, three travelers of ambiguous origin and intent come to Seattle, where they are drawn for some purpose, although they don't know what.

And basically, after that, not much makes sense. I hate to put it that way, but even at the end it seems hard to understand exactly what happened. That Chaos had squeezed time from both the end and the beginning, destroying history and futurity at the same time, is strange, but understandable. But aside from the fact that the architect of the universe's salvation planned to basically cause a new one to be born, it's hard to understand how that plan was supposed to happen. I really didn't understand what the sum-runners were, what the point of the numbers was, who the Livid Mistress was or why she was collecting people, and how the collectors had partners that could do things like control wasps, fire, or whatever. He gave no real explanations, just lots and lots of details that shed no light.

As far as whether the plot was compelling in any way, it really wasn't. For one, jumping back and forth between points of view of people for whom nothing was happening hardly drove the story along, and it was probably about halfway through the book when any significant events actually occurred.

Now, this review probably makes it seem like I didn't enjoy the book, but if I hadn't enjoyed it at all, I certainly wouldn't give it three stars. I felt that the story was a good idea and Bear's writing was actually fairly smooth. The characters actually seemed to have their own personalities so they were easy to identify. I didn't always know what was going on, but I thought his descriptions were pretty good and the book was very inventive, so I enjoyed it well enough.

All in all, it's a bit too long for being so incomprehensible. I can only take that in shorter doses. I have never read another Greg Bear, although I did skim through Blood Music a while ago. I guess you might have a more favorable opinion if you're a big Bear fan, or not. I would not recommend this to anyone who's not a hardcore sci-fi fan, and probably not most of them. If you're into seriously apocalyptic sci-fi, this might be something to add to your reading list.



View all my reviews

April 04, 2012

The Talisman


The Talisman
The Talisman by Stephen King

My rating: 3 of 5 stars



I don't know. I like the story, as I almost always do with Stephen King's books, but there are some aspects of the writing I really hate. I don't know if it's his upbringing or just the way he writes, but sometimes it just sounds so terrible to me. "Put some bop on the radio, Jackie-boy" is what Jack's mother says to him, and while I can imagine that someone, somewhere, has said something like this, it sounds unbearably cornball to me. On top of that, he can't make the villains seem threatening to save his life. "Sunlight" Gardner is a parody of a televangelist. It's not that I have a problem of him making fun of the Jimmy Swaggart-Robert Tilton types, it's that he doesn't do it well. I know King is unfamiliar with evangelicals, but the only way you would know Gardner is charismatic is because King says no, not because he comes across that way.

Another problem I had with the book overall is that I have no idea why Jack's mom keeps running from Sloat. Why didn't she just hire another lawyer and appoint him guardian over the investments that would become Jack's when she died? Why didn't she go to a hospital? It's not like they weren't rich. On top of that, Jack's mom is just annoying. Pretending there's nothing wrong and running away! Come on, lady, that's no way to take care of your kid.

I don't really have a problem with much else, except it's seriously awkward to keep hearing "white" equated with good and "black" equated with evil. Sure, I know it's been done before (and is a recurring theme in King's fantasy) but when he says "the good, the white" as if the two are automatically the same thing just makes me want to shout out that it's a super-hackneyed cliche.

Oh yeah, and Parker doesn't really sound believable as a Southern black man. I know King didn't grow up with too many people of color around (I mean, Maine, really) so I don't know why he thought he could write a believable voice for one. Not that he's not a sympathetic character, and on the side of good, it's just he also sounds really corny and makes me cringe a bit.

Other than that, I really don't have a problem with the story itself. Kind of a modern hero's journey in the classic mold (as Joseph Campbell described it) set mostly in modern America but sometimes in a fantastical world. The more human and real King keeps it, the better. That's what he's exceptionally good at.

I'd still recommend it to most King fans, and possibly fantasy fans depending on what kind of fantasy they like. But there are definitely some folks for whom the drawbacks will be too overwhelming.



View all my reviews